##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Liberal theology was a characteristic that stood out in Bultmann's day. Several questions arise: Who is Rudolf Karl Bultmann? How did Bultmann and his thinking demotologi? What are Bultmann's works? How Demithologization and Its Impact on 21st Century Era Christianity? The solution is: (1) Bultman is a New Testament figure based on his form criticism. (2) The demotology says that the entire New Testament is a myth. Especially the stories about the Lord Jesus. He argued that the experiences of the Lord Jesus' ministry, his miracles, death, and resurrection, were stories fabricated by the early church. Biblical evangelicals believe in the invalidity of the Bible and all supernatural events that are recorded in the Bible, both the Old Testament, as well as the events of the preaching of the Word carried out by the Lord Jesus Christ and the Rulers, accompanied by a statement of power, is a truth that also makes sense. Christian faith, cannot accept unreasonable things.Bultmann'sdemitologization should not be taken as a theology, but as a discourse of seeking the truth with no clear origin, a thought for those who do not know God, namely vain thoughts, dark understanding.

References

  1. Morris Ashcraft. Maker of the Modern Theological Mind, Rudolf Bultman, (Texas: Word Book Publisher, 1972). p 15.
     Google Scholar
  2. M. Ashcraft, Maker of the Modern Theological Mind, Rudolf Bultman,Texas: Word Book Publisher, 1972.
     Google Scholar
  3. T. Lone,RuntutPijar,Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  4. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Bultmann, (Accessed on: 10 December 2017)
     Google Scholar
  5. F.D. Wellem. Riwayat Hidupsingkattokoh-tokohdalamsejarahGereja, Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  6. L. Bagus, Kamus Filsafat, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  7. C. Wahyudi, “Eksistensialisme,” JurnalTeosofi2,374, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  8. https://claus08192222454.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/rudolf-bultman-pit/, (Accessed on: 11 December 2017).
     Google Scholar
  9. https://fadlijafar.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/ rudolf-bultmann thoughts (Accessed on: 11 December2017).
     Google Scholar
  10. http://dangkalilmu.blogspot.co.id/2015/05/pemikiran-hermeneutika-rudolf-karl.html,(Accessed on: 11 December 2017).
     Google Scholar
  11. F.D. Wellem, Riwayat Hidupsingkattokoh-tokohdalamsejarahGereja. 60.
     Google Scholar
  12. H. HadiwijonoTheologiReformatorisabadke 20,Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  13. T. Lone. RuntutPijar, Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hodern. Rudolf Bultman, New Testament and Mythology, London: Tyndale Press 1953.
     Google Scholar
  15. Ridderbos. Kerygma and Myth, London: Tyndale Press, 1953.
     Google Scholar
  16. C. Brown,Filsafat dan Iman Kristen, Jakarta: Lembaga Reformed Injili Indonesia, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  17. H.Hadiwijono. TheologiReformatorisabadke 20.
     Google Scholar
  18. Y. Moro. Transcendence and Imanence in Contemporary Theology: A ReportArticle, North East Asia Journal of Theology, 64, 196.
     Google Scholar
  19. H. M. Conn. TeologiKontemporer, Malang: SAAT, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  20. F.D. Wellem. Riwayat Hidupsingkattokoh-tokohdalamsejarahGereja. h 60.
     Google Scholar
  21. H.Hadiwijono. TheologiReformatorisabadke 20, Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  22. T. Lone. RuntutPijar, Jakarta: BPK GunungMulia, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  23. Hodern. Rudolf Bultman, New Testament and Mythology, London: Tyndale Press 1953.
     Google Scholar
  24. Ridderbos. Kerygma and Myth, London: Tyndale Press, 1953.
     Google Scholar